Leather Search Google

Why aren't new movies shot with digital cameras? - digital projectors for movie theaters

I am sure that the costs do not include the issue of 200 million more films are still shot on 35mm, so there must be a reason.

I know that there is a benefit of the film that it technically can be analyzed in detail for an indefinite period, even though (after a while and I'm pretty sure that is 1080p), near the border, all that I get more grain and not "new" detail.

But apart from that, I really do not understand why they still film. It 4K cameras, the inclusion of detailed and "resolution" real.

IMAX films look great, but not really as high def. Motion pictures in the newspapers do not really seem that high resolution or if you take a digital projector and a movie in a comic-conventional size theater screen, receives at least the same if the image is better without noise. In fact, it is not what they do when you see a "digital projection" film? Of course, not the Blu-ray, but have a digital version of the film, probably in 2K or HD, and much more! So, why not all the films not only, but also that shot?

Forget IMAX cameras in a few years, you can install cameras 10K, that do what aspect ratio you want, and theater to really take advantage of the huge IMAX screen and display with a resolution of tons can. The cameras are small and all the films could be shot with them, instead of moving them to shoot around 10 tonnes of human-sized IMAX camera to 3 scenesis part of The Dark Knight and Transformers 2 ...?

I mean, I'm sure there's a reason still uses film, I do not understand what it is ... The technology is not it?